Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı implant üstü tek kuronlarda kuron-implant boyu oranının ve karşıt dentisyon durumunun marjinal kemik kaybına etkisini araştırmaktır. Şubat 2016-Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında tek diş için yerleştirilmiş 133 implantın değerlendirildiği çalışmada marjinal kemik kayıpları panoramik röntgenler aracılığıyla ölçülmüştür. Yapılan değerlendirmede kuron/implant (K/İ) boyu oranları hesaplanmış, bu oranın 1’den büyük veya küçük olmasına göre veriler iki gruba ayrılmıştır. İmplantların karşıtındaki dişlerin durumu kaydedilmiş ve doğal diş, diş üstü kuron veya implant üstü kuron olmak üzere yine marjinal kemik kaybı üzerine etkileri iki grup için araştırılmıştır. İstatiksel analizler sonucu K/İ oranının marjinal kemik kaybı üzerine etkisi olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır (p=0,560).  Karşıt ark dentisyonu ile kemik kayıpları arasındaki ilişkiler ise Grup1 (p=0,977) ve Grup 2 (p=0,699) de istatistiksel olarak anlamsız bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tek Kuron, Simante, Kuron İmplant Oranı, Sabit Protez

---

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of crown-implant (C/I) ratio and opposing arch status on marginal bone loss in single implant supported crowns. In the study, 133 implants placed between February 2016 and December 2019 were evaluated for marginal bone loss which is measured by panoramic x-rays. In the evaluation, the C/I ratios were calculated, and the data were divided into two groups according to whether this ratio was greater or less than 1. The condition of the teeth opposite the implants was recorded as natural teeth, tooth supported crowns or implant supported crowns. Their effects on marginal bone loss were also investigated. As a result of statistical analysis, it was concluded that the C/I ratio had no effect on marginal bone loss (p=0.560). The relationships between the opposing arch dentition and bone loss were statistically insignificant in Group1 (p=0.977) and Group 2 (p=0.699).

Keywords

Single Crown, Cemented, Crown Implant Ratio, Fixed Prosthesis

---

Referanslar | References

1.         Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986,1(1):11-25.

2.         Ante I: The fundamental principles of abutment. Michigan D Soc Bull 1926,8:14-23.

3.         Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Arat S: The role of timing of loading on later marginal bone loss around dental implants: a retrospective clinical study. Journal of oral Implantology 2010,36(5):363-76.

4.         Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang S-K: Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants. Journal of oral Implantology 2010,36(6):425-33.

5.         Blanes R J: To what extent does the crown–implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant‐supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clinical oral implants research 2009,20:67-72.

6.         Boronat A, Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Marti E: Marginal bone loss in dental implants subjected to early loading (6 to 8 weeks postplacement) with a retrospective short-term follow-up. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2008,66(2):246-50.

7.         Carlsson G E, Lindquist L W, Jemt T: Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2000,13(4).

8.         Castellanos-Cosano L, Carrasco-García A, Corcuera-Flores J R, Silvestre-Rangil J, Torres-Lagares D, Machuca-Portillo G: An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study. Odontology 2021,109(3):649-60.

9.         Dereci Ö, Mumcu E, Dereci O N, Dayan S, Koşar Y, Fadhil S M T: Effects of implant-related variables on the marginal bone loss around dental implants. Quintessence Int 2020,51(2):118-26.

10.       Dorj O, Lin H K, Salamanca E, Pan Y H, Wu Y F, Hsu Y S, Lin J C, Lin C K, Chang W J: Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021,18(20).

11.       Guljé F L, Raghoebar G M, Erkens W A, Meijer H J: Impact of Crown-Implant Ratio of Single Restorations Supported by 6-mm Implants: A Short-Term Case Series Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016,31(3):672-5.

12.       Klein M, Tarnow D, Lehrfield L: Marginal Bone Changes on Ultraclean, Micro-Threaded Platform-Switched Implants Following Restoration: 1- to 4-Year Data. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2020,41(4):e7-e18.

13.       Lee S Y, Koak J Y, Kim S K, Rhyu I C, Ku Y, Heo S J, Han C H: A Long-Term Prospective Evaluation of Marginal Bone Level Change Around Different Implant Systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016,31(3):657-64.

14.       Malchiodi L, Cucchi A, Ghensi P, Consonni D, Nocini P F: Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014,25(2):240-51.

15.       Meijer H J, Telleman G, Gareb C, Den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar G M: Comparison of implant-supported crown length measured on digitized casts and intraoral radiographs. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2012,25(4).

16.       Misch C E: Dental implant prosthetics-E-book: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2004.

17.       Pellizzer E P, Marcela de Luna Gomes J, Araújo Lemos C A, Minatel L, Justino de Oliveira Limírio J P, Dantas de Moraes S L: The influence of crown-to-implant ratio in single crowns on clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021,126(4):497-502.

18.       Rangert B R, Sullivan R M, Jemt T M: Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1997,12(3).

19.       Richter E J: In vivo horizontal bending moments on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998,13(2):232-44.

20.       Sasada Y, Cochran D L: Implant-Abutment Connections: A Review of Biologic Consequences and Peri-implantitis Implications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017,32(6):1296-307.

21.       Schillingburg Jr H, Hobo S, Whitsett L: Fundamentals of fixed prostodontics. Quintess Pub. Co. Inc Chicago, Berlin 2000.

22.       Sun S P, Moon I S, Park K H, Lee D W: Effect of Crown to Implant Ratio and Anatomical Crown Length on Clinical Conditions in a Single Implant: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015,17(4):724-31.

23.       Şahin S, Cehreli M C, Yalçın E: The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. Journal of dentistry 2002,30(7-8):271-82.

24.       Tercanli Alkis H, Turker N: Retrospective evaluation of marginal bone loss around implants in a mandibular locator-retained denture using panoramic radiographic images and finite element analysis: A pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019,21(6):1199-205.

25.       Ting M, Tenaglia M S, Jones G H, Suzuki J B: Surgical and patient factors affecting marginal bone levels around dental implants: a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews. Implant Dentistry 2017,26(2):303-15.

26.       Urdaneta R A, Daher S, Lery J, Emanuel K, Chuang S-K: Factors associated with crestal bone gain on single-tooth locking-taper implants: the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011,26(5):1063-78.

27.       Urdaneta R A, Leary J, Panetta K M, Chuang S K: The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014,25(2):e179-88.

28.       Urdaneta R A, Rodriguez S, McNeil D C, Weed M, Chuang S K: The effect of increased crown-to-implant ratio on single-tooth locking-taper implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010,25(4):729-43.

29.       Weinberg L A: The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1993,8(1).